?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

the curious minds of liberals

***
THE SAN FRANCISCO JUDGE WHO OVERTURNED MILLIONS OF CALIFORNIA VOTES
ON PROP 8 RULED THAT A CHILD HAS NO ‘RIGHT’ TO A MOTHER OR FATHER

What’s so strange about that?

I mean if an unborn child has no right to be born, why should a born child have a right to a mother and father?

The Child Is Father of the Man ... NOT!

Nothing is too illogical or irrational when you become a true believer, a dyed-in-the-wool, agenda-driven liberal.

In fact, why resort to a Constitutional, rule-of-law, consent-of-the-governed federal republican, representative democracy anyway?

If the people vote for some thing - SUE, and find a liberal judge to contort the Constitution, make up hypothetical objections, ignore precedent, and overturn it.

If the people vote for a person - SUE, ask for a recount, and another, and another, and another, change the rules, introduce new ballots found in the trunks of cars and backseats after the election, use different criteria to invalidate certain votes and validate others, and find a liberal judge to rule in your favor.

If liberals have a referendum put up for a vote and lose, put up another, and another, and another, until you get one passed … OR, find a liberal activist judge to legislate your wishes by fiat.

If a liberal administration executes an unconstitutional directive and it is overturned by the courts, issue another order, and another, and another until they their way.

If liberals are pounded with facts, they pound the table until they get their way.

If a liberal is getting beat in a debate, they call their opponents racists.

The media will always be on their side, so they can pretty much get away with anything, so they should be imaginative and innovative.

And on, and on, and on.

And that’s why it should come as no surprise that a judge who declared that marriage itself has been homophobic for thousands of years should have no problem asserting that a child, who can only be born between people of the opposite sex, has no right to either.

After all, if a liberal believes that an unborn child has no right to be born, it’s no stretch to assert that a born child has no rights to a mother or father.

There are, actually, according to liberals, no natural, unalienable, God-given rights at all … only what “enlightened” liberals say there are.

As in: the right to marry someone of the opposite sex, or to kill the unborn, or to confiscate the hard-earned property of others and redistribute it to their friends, or to limit their opponents' free speech.

See? It’s easy being a liberal.

You don't even have to know anything. Just what you want. Just what you think is fair.

So again ... what’s the problem?

Latest Month

August 2014
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com